Table of Contents

How to Migrate from SAP ECC to SAP S/4HANA ERP

How to Migrate from SAP ECC to SAP S/4HANA ERP

Table of Contents

Business data no longer grows at a steady pace, and it may surge quickly across transaction reports and operational systems. SAP ECC was designed for predictable workloads and can struggle under this pressure, often leading to delayed insights and temporary workarounds

That is why many businesses have begun migrating from SAP ECC to SAP S/4HANA ERP, as real-time financial visibility, faster analytics, and large-scale transaction processing have become essential. SAP S/4HANA processes data directly in memory and can deliver results almost instantly. Batch-dependent reporting becomes less relevant, enabling continuous, real-time decision-making.

Over the years, we’ve built several large-scale SAP modernization and ERP transformation solutions, powered by SAP HANA in-memory architecture and the SAP Activate methodology. As we have this expertise, we’re sharing this blog to discuss the steps to migrate from SAP ECC to SAP S/4HANA ERP.

Key Market Takeaways for ERP Softwares

According to Grand View Research, the global ERP software market continues to show strong momentum. Valued at USD 64.83 billion in 2024, it is expected to grow to USD 123.41 billion by 2030, with a 11.7 percent CAGR from 2025 to 2030. This growth reflects how ERP systems have shifted from being operational tools to becoming core digital infrastructure for modern businesses.

Key Market Takeaways for ERP Softwares

Source: Grand View Research

ERP adoption is accelerating because companies want a single source of truth across finance, operations, supply chain, and human resources. Centralized data, automated workflows, and real-time visibility help organizations respond faster, reduce operational waste, and scale across regions. 

Cloud-based ERP has further lowered adoption barriers by improving flexibility, accessibility, and cost efficiency, especially for manufacturing, finance, and globally distributed teams.

Among leading platforms, Microsoft Dynamics 365 stands out for organizations already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem, with AI features such as Copilot enhancing finance and supply chain intelligence. 

Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP remains a strong choice for large, complex enterprises that require advanced predictive planning and global compliance. 

In parallel, SAP’s expanded partnership with Accenture in 2025 through the ADVANCE initiative highlights a clear market focus on helping high-growth companies adopt cloud ERP and AI capabilities faster and more reliably.

Overview of SAP ECC 

SAP ECC stands for SAP ERP Central Component. Often simply called SAP ERP, ECC is the core on-premises enterprise resource planning software suite that has powered global business operations for decades. Think of it as the central nervous system of a traditional enterprise, integrating key functions like:

  • Finance (FI)
  • Controlling (CO)
  • Sales and Distribution (SD)
  • Materials Management (MM)
  • Production Planning (PP)
  • Human Capital Management (HCM)

ECC excels as a system of record. It is a highly reliable transactional database designed to meticulously log business activity. This includes processing orders, posting invoices, and managing inventory. Its strength lies in stability and depth of functionality, built over years of customization.

Think of SAP ECC as a powerful, reliable library with an expert archivist. You can find any historical record you need, but generating a real-time, cross-referenced report requires time and manual effort.

What is SAP HANA?

SAP HANA stands for SAP High Performance ANalytic Appliance.

This is the revolutionary core of modern SAP. It is not an ERP application itself but a powerful in-memory, column-oriented, relational database management system. This technical foundation translates into three game-changing attributes.

In Memory Computing

Unlike traditional ECC databases that read and write data to slower hard disks, HANA stores all data in RAM. This eliminates data retrieval latency and enables processing speeds up to 10,000x faster for certain operations.


Column-Oriented Storage

This architecture is optimized for rapid aggregation and analysis of large datasets. It is ideal for real-time analytics on live transactional data.


A Platform

HANA also functions as an application platform that supports advanced data processing, machine learning, and modern application development.

Think of SAP HANA as a supercomputer that not only stores every book in the library but can instantly analyze every sentence across all books, uncover hidden patterns, and predict future outcomes.


The Evolution: SAP S/4HANA

SAP S/4HANA stands for SAP Business Suite 4 SAP HANA. S/4 is the fourth generation of SAP Business Suite, and HANA indicates it is natively built to run exclusively on the HANA database.

S/4HANA is not ECC running on a faster database. It is a ground-up ERP redesign that leverages HANA to simplify processes, unify data models, and embed intelligence directly into business workflows.

Key Differences Between SAP ECC and SAP S/4HANA

The legacy setup reliably records transactions, but it may feel slow when real-time insights are required. Modern architecture runs in memory, enabling data to be processed instantly and analytics to occur in real time.

Organizations can often move from hindsight reporting to real-time decision-making while keeping the core system simpler and faster.

FeatureSAP ECC (The Legacy Powerhouse)SAP S/4HANA (The Intelligent Suite)
DatabaseRuns on various third-party databases such as Oracle and IBM DB2Runs exclusively on the SAP HANA in-memory database
Data ModelComplex and redundant. Uses aggregate and index tables, such as separate FI and CO tablesRadically simplified. The Universal Journal (ACDOCA) consolidates FI and CO into a single table. MATDOC consolidates material data
User ExperiencePrimarily classic SAP GUI with a functional but complex interfaceSAP Fiori delivers a modern role-based web and mobile-first experience
Analytics and ReportingSeparate and batch-driven. Requires extraction to BW for reportingEmbedded and real-time analytics using CDS views inside transactions
Core PhilosophySystem of record focused on transactional historySystem of intelligence focused on real time and predictive decision making
DeploymentPrimarily on-premiseFlexible deployment, including on-premises, private cloud, public cloud, or hybrid through RISE with SAP
CustomizationHeavy ABAP custom code in the core, leading to complex upgradesClean Core approach with extensions on SAP BTP
Business ImpactStability and depth with slower insightsSpeed, simplification, AI-driven foresight, and continuous innovation

The Real World Impact of These Differences

  • For Finance: Month-end closing cycles shrink from days to hours through the Universal Journal.
  • For Supply Chain: Predictive material planning can help prevent stockouts.
  • For Users: SAP Fiori reduces training time and improves adoption by making workflows intuitive and accessible.
  • For IT: A Clean Core on S/4HANA lowers total cost of ownership, simplifies upgrades, and accelerates innovation cycles.

Benefits of Migrating from SAP ECC to SAP S/4HANA ERP for Your Business

For years, SAP ECC has been the reliable workhorse of your enterprise, processing orders, managing finances, and keeping operations running. But reliability is no longer enough. In an era of AI, real-time analytics, and constant disruption, an ERP must serve as a strategic driver rather than remain only a system of record.

Migrating from SAP ECC to SAP S/4HANA is not just an IT upgrade. It is a business transformation. Below are the concrete benefits that help organizations move from maintaining stability to achieving sustained growth.

1. Real-Time Intelligence 

ECC Reality: Month-end reports are generated to understand what happened in the last quarter. Most decisions rely on historical data.

S/4HANA Benefit: Live P and L dashboards can be monitored during the day. The system may alert teams about a supply chain bottleneck in Singapore before shipments are impacted.

  • Universal Journal ACDOCA: Financial and operational data is unified, enabling soft close processes and real-time reporting.
  • Embedded Analytics: Insights are available directly within transactions, eliminating the need for separate data warehouses for basic reporting.

2. Radical Process Simplification & Speed

ECC Reality: Complex data models rely on multiple tables for basic tasks. Material ledger updates or profitability analysis may take hours to complete.

S/4HANA Benefit: The simplified data model on the HANA database collapses thousands of tables. Processes that once took hours can now finish in seconds.

  • 10x Faster Processing: Month-end closing cycles can be reduced from ten days to one.
  • Simplified Inventory: More than twenty material tables are consolidated into a single table called MATDOC.
  • Instant Analytics: Complex profitability reports can run in real time without batch processing.

3. The Modern User Experience 

ECC Reality: Users work with complex SAP GUI screens that require extensive training and often result in low adoption.

S/4HANA Benefit: SAP Fiori provides a personalized, intuitive web- and mobile-first interface that mirrors modern consumer applications.

  • 75 Percent Reduction in Training Time: Role-based applications guide users through tasks more naturally.
  • Higher Adoption: Access is available across devices and locations.
  • Increased Productivity: Processes that once required ten clicks can now be completed in two.

4. Embedded AI & Machine Learning

ECC Reality: AI capabilities exist as separate projects that are costly and complex to implement.

S/4HANA Benefit: Joule and embedded machine learning are built directly into core business processes. Routine work is automated while predictive insights support better decisions.

  • Smart Finance: AI-powered cash application automatically matches payments with up to ninety-five percent accuracy.
  • Predictive Supply Chain: Machine learning forecasts demand and recommends optimal stock levels, reducing inventory costs by fifteen to thirty percent.
  • Intuitive Procurement: The system recommends suppliers and anticipates price changes using historical and market data.

5. Unified Business Planning & Execution

ECC Reality: Planning systems such as APO and execution systems operate separately, which creates data gaps and slower response times.

S/4HANA Benefits: Advanced Available-to-Promise and integrated business planning provide a single view of demand, supply, and execution.

  • Real-Time Promising: Accurate delivery dates can be confirmed instantly for customers.
  • Integrated Planning: Operational plans remain aligned as market conditions change.

Types of SAP ECC to S/4HANA Migration Approaches

Some teams may choose to convert what already runs, so that history and custom logic remain largely intact. Others can selectively move selected processes or entities into a new core, reducing complexity gradually and keeping risk under control.

Types of SAP ECC to S/4HANA Migration Approaches

1. System Conversion (Brownfield)

A system conversion keeps your existing SAP ECC system and technically converts it to S/4HANA. Historical data, custom code, configurations, and business processes are largely retained, reducing disruption and shortening timelines. 

This approach suits organizations with stable processes that want faster value without redesigning their SAP landscape from scratch.


2. System Landscape Transformation 

This approach selectively migrates specific business units, regions, or processes from one or multiple ECC systems into a new S/4HANA environment. It allows consolidation, harmonization, and gradual modernization while avoiding a full big-bang migration. 

Companies with complex landscapes or merger-driven SAP environments often choose this path to ensure a controlled transformation.


3. New Implementation (Greenfield)

A new implementation starts with a clean S/4HANA system and redesigns business processes based on best practices. Only the required data is migrated, which eliminates technical debt and outdated customizations. 

This approach is ideal for organizations seeking process standardization, simplification, and long-term innovation rather than preserving legacy behaviors.


4. Hybrid Approach 

The hybrid approach combines system conversion and new implementation strategies. Core processes may be converted to maintain stability, while selected areas, such as finance and supply chain, are re-implemented to unlock S/4HANA’s full capabilities. It offers flexibility for enterprises balancing speed, risk, and the depth of transformation.

How to Migrate from SAP ECC to SAP S/4HANA ERP?

Migrating from SAP ECC to SAP S/4HANA usually starts with a detailed review of the current system and a readiness check for simplification items and data quality. Master data should be cleaned early, and custom code adjusted to ensure the system behaves correctly on HANA.

Our team has successfully led SAP ECC-to-S/4HANA migrations for many clients, and this is how we typically execute them.

1. Landscape & Impact Review

We start by reviewing the existing SAP ECC landscape, including integrations, custom developments, and system dependencies. Revenue-critical and compliance-sensitive processes are identified early to avoid disruption. We also define clear business KPIs to evaluate success after the S/4HANA transition.


2. Readiness & Data Cleanup

We run SAP Readiness Check 2.0 to assess technical compatibility and the impact of simplification. Master data is cleaned and standardized to reduce migration risks. CVI preparation is handled carefully to ensure a smooth move to the Business Partner model.


3. Code & Clean Core Strategy

In this phase, we analyze custom ABAP code to identify what can be retired, refactored, or optimized for S/4HANA. Legacy enhancements that no longer add value are removed. We plan a clean core approach and design extensions on SAP BTP to support future scalability.


4. Migration Execution

We execute the selected migration path, whether Greenfield, Brownfield, or Bluefield, based on business needs. For selective migrations, data carve-outs are managed with precision. Comprehensive functional and technical testing ensures business continuity in the new system.


5. Fiori & Analytics Enablement

We activate role-based SAP Fiori apps to improve usability and adoption. CDS Views are built to support real-time embedded analytics. The user experience is optimized for mobile and modern work patterns.


6. Go-Live & Optimization

We manage cutover activities to minimize downtime. Post go-live, we provide hypercare support to stabilize operations. Once the system is steady, we help clients move forward with AI, automation, and continuous innovation initiatives on the S/4HANA platform.

How Much Custom Code Typically Survives an S/4HANA Migration?

In most S/4HANA migrations, only about twenty to forty percent of custom ABAP code will typically survive in a usable form. Core business logic may remain, but it will usually need refactoring to work correctly with the in-memory data model.

The rest will gradually be retired or replaced as standard capabilities can now deliver the same outcomes more efficiently.

The Starting Point

To understand the scale of the problem, it helps to quantify it. A mature SAP ECC system typically contains

  • 10,000 to 40,000 plus custom ABAP objects
  • 2 to 5 million lines of custom code
  • Code written over 15 to 25 years by many developers
  • Deep dependencies on tables and transactions that no longer exist in S/4HANA

This goes beyond customization. It represents accumulated technical debt and S four HANA forces it into the open.


The Survival Rate

Only around 20 to 40 percent of custom code survives unchanged.

Code CategoryTypical Survival RateFate in S four HANA
Actively Used Business Logic15 to 25 percentAdapted and migrated to work with simplified data models such as MATDOC
Reports and Utilities5 to 15 percentReplaced by Fiori apps and embedded analytics using CDS views
Obsolete or Unused Code40 to 60 percentArchived and retired when not executed for more than two years
UI Enhancements0 to 10 percentFully replaced by standard Fiori applications
Integration Code10 to 20 percentReplatformed to SAP BTP to support a clean core

In practical terms, this means 60 to 80 percent of custom code is retired replaced or fundamentally transformed.


The Three-Tiered Assessment: What Actually Survives

Tier 1: The Must-Have Business Logic

Around 15 to 25 percent

What survives

  • Logic supporting unique regulatory or compliance requirements
  • Code that delivers real competitive differentiation
  • Complex integrations with niche or legacy systems

Why it survives

These objects represent real business value. They are not lifted and shifted, but refactored to align with S/4HANA data models and access patterns. Direct table reads and aggregate dependencies must be removed.

Tier 2: Replaceable Functionality

Around 20 to 30 percent

Simple reports, such as ALV outputs and table queries, are often replaced first because real-time analytics can deliver the same insights more efficiently. Minor UI customizations and custom transactions may also be removed, as standard applications can handle most daily tasks cleanly.

What replaces it

  • Standard Fiori apps that cover most operational tasks
  • Embedded analytics powered by CDS views
  • Standard workflow and validation frameworks

This category delivers quick wins by reducing complexity without harming the business.

Tier 3: Technical Debt

Around 40 to 60 percent

What gets retired

  • Code not executed for two years or more
  • One-off programs built for temporary needs
  • Custom logic that duplicates standard SAP functionality
  • Objects built on outdated approaches like classic Dynpros or legacy RFC patterns

This is the true purge opportunity. Every retired object lowers future upgrade cost and simplifies the landscape.


The Migration Path Shapes Survival

The chosen migration strategy has a major impact on how much code survives

Brownfield System Conversion

Technical retention is typically high, and up to 80% of custom code may be moved forward initially. In practice, nearly half of this code will still need remediation to run correctly on the new data model. The main risk is that obsolete logic may quietly carry over into the new system and increase long-term complexity.

Greenfield New Implementation

Code retention is generally very low, often below 10%. Only true business differentiators are rebuilt while everything else shifts to standard processes. This approach can deliver the strongest clean core outcome over time.

Bluefield Selective Data Transition

Retention typically ranges from 20% to 40%, depending on business priorities. Decisions are guided by current value rather than historical usage. This method can carefully balance continuity with meaningful simplification.


The Clean Core Imperative

In S/4HANA, survival is not just about compatibility. It is about alignment with clean core principles.

Ask these questions for every custom object

  • Can standard S/4HANA functionality replace it?
  • Does it provide a real competitive advantage?
  • Can it be moved to SAP BTP instead of staying in the core?
  • Is it actively used and maintained today?

If the answer to any of these questions is no, the right decision is to archive and retire it.

The ABAP purge is not a loss. It is the foundation for a more agile upgrade friendly and innovation-ready SAP landscape.

Is Brownfield Migration Cheaper than Greenfield or Bluefield?

When facing the monumental task of migrating from SAP ECC to SAP S/4HANA, the cost question dominates boardroom discussions. A pervasive assumption often takes hold. A Brownfield conversion must be cheaper than Greenfield or Bluefield. It feels like a technical upgrade, not a reinvention.

As a strategic partner, it is important to pause and apply a reality check. The answer is far more nuanced than a simple yes or no. To make the right decision, the cost discussion must move beyond upfront budgets and focus on long-term value and ownership.

Is Brownfield Migration Cheaper than Greenfield or Bluefield?

The Initial Appeal: Why Brownfield Seems Cheaper

On the surface, Brownfield often appears to be the most economical choice.

  • Lower initial data migration effort: Most data is moved using SAP standard tools such as SUM and DMO. Less effort is required to redesign data structures or define new migration rules.
  • Business process continuity: Existing processes remain familiar to users. This may reduce training effort and limit short-term disruption to daily operations.
  • Perceived speed: A technical conversion can be completed faster than designing and implementing a brand-new system.

These factors create the impression of a lower upfront project cost. However, this view focuses only on the migration phase and not on the total cost of ownership over the next 5 to 10 years.


The Hidden Costs of Brownfield

A Brownfield migration brings the entire legacy system forward. That includes outdated processes, unused custom code, and poor data quality. The real costs often surface after go live.

Cost AreaBrownfield RealityFinancial Impact
Custom code adaptationAll existing custom programs must be tested and remediated for S/4HANA compatibility. This effort is often greater and less predictable than expected.High and variable cost that can significantly exceed initial estimates
Carrying forward complexityInefficient and redundant processes are preserved. Opportunities for simplification are missed.Ongoing operational inefficiency and higher support effort
Clean core limitationsLegacy customizations remain embedded in the core system. This makes upgrades and innovation harder over time.Higher future upgrade costs and slower adoption of SAP innovations
Data quality and architecturePoor-quality legacy data is migrated into the new system. Reporting and analytics challenges continue.Continuous cost for data cleansing and limited analytical value

The Strategic Investment

Greenfield and Bluefield migrations typically entail higher upfront costs due to more extensive transformation work.

This includes business process redesign, configuration of new system landscapes, and structured data cleansing and migration planning.

However, these costs are investments that unlock long-term operational and strategic benefits.

Investment AreaGreenfield and Bluefield AdvantageLong Term Value
Process optimizationBest practice S/4HANA processes are implemented from the start. Manual steps are reduced, and automation increases.Lower operational costs and faster cycle times
Clean core and agilityThe system starts clean with extensions built outside the core using modern approaches.Easier upgrades and lower cost of ownership over time
Data and analytics foundationA high-quality data model enables embedded analytics and real-time insights.Better decision-making and stronger business intelligence

The Verdict

Is Brownfield always cheaper? No. It often has the lowest initial migration cost but the highest Total Cost of Ownership.

A useful analogy is renovating an old house versus building a modern one. Renovation may seem faster and cheaper at first, but ongoing maintenance, hidden issues, and outdated infrastructure can drive costs higher over time. A new build requires a higher upfront investment but delivers efficiency, stability, and lower operating costs for years to come.

The Ideal Path

The right migration approach depends on business priorities, not assumptions.

Choose Brownfield if:

Processes are already efficient, custom code is limited and well-governed, and the primary goal is to meet the 2027 deadline with minimal organizational change. This path favors short-term compliance.

Choose Greenfield if:

Processes are outdated, technical debt is high, and the organization is seeking transformation rather than continuity. This approach prioritizes long-term efficiency and lower TCO.

Choose Bluefield if:

A balance is required. Core processes need modernization, but critical historical data and selected business logic must be retained. This approach offers transformation with controlled risk.

Conclusion

Migrating from SAP ECC to SAP S 4HANA is a defining enterprise decision that can shape performance and long-term agility. It should influence how systems respond in real time and how AI-driven processes are adopted across the business. Organizations that plan this move carefully can stay resilient and competitive in an increasingly intelligent ERP environment.

Looking to Migrate from SAP ECC to SAP S/4HANA ERP?

IdeaUsher can guide your transition from SAP ECC to SAP S/4HANA with a clean, core mindset and a clear technical plan. We may carefully assess custom code data volume and integrations, so only business-critical elements migrate

With over 500,000 hours of coding expertise and a team led by ex-MAANG and FAANG developers, we bring Silicon Valley-grade engineering discipline to your SAP landscape. We ensure your migration is strategic, not just technical.

Here’s how we make your journey unique:

  • Clean Core Champions: We migrate customizations to SAP BTP, ensuring your S/4HANA stays agile for continuous innovation.
  • AI First Integration: We embed intelligence, such as Joule AI, into workflows, turning your ERP into a proactive business partner.
  • Selective Data Strategy: We help you migrate only what matters, leaving behind legacy clutter for a fresh, high-performance start.

Check out our latest projects to see the transformative work we deliver.

Work with Ex-MAANG developers to build next-gen apps schedule your consultation now

FAQs

Q1: Is SAP ECC to S 4HANA migration mandatory for all enterprises?

A1: Yes, it effectively is mandatory because SAP will end mainstream support for ECC, which means security patches and innovations will slow down fast. Staying on ECC may expose systems to operational risk and higher maintenance costs. Most enterprises should plan the move early to stay compliant and future-ready.

Q2: How long does a typical SAP S 4HANA migration take?

A2: The timeline usually depends on system complexity and data volume. A focused project may finish in around six months, while large landscapes can take well over eighteen months. With proper planning, it can move steadily without disrupting core business operations.

Q3: Which migration approach is best for large enterprises?

A3: Large enterprises typically benefit from Bluefield or a phased hybrid approach. These methods allow selective transformation while keeping critical processes running. It may also reduce risk by avoiding a single-step full system reset.

Q4: Can SAP S 4HANA support new revenue-generating platforms?

A4: Yes, it can, especially when paired with SAP BTP and a Clean Core setup. This combination allows faster innovation and easier integration with digital platforms. Enterprises can gradually build new revenue streams without overloading the core system.

Picture of Debangshu Chanda

Debangshu Chanda

I’m a Technical Content Writer with over five years of experience. I specialize in turning complex technical information into clear and engaging content. My goal is to create content that connects experts with end-users in a simple and easy-to-understand way. I have experience writing on a wide range of topics. This helps me adjust my style to fit different audiences. I take pride in my strong research skills and keen attention to detail.
Share this article:
Related article:

Hire The Best Developers

Hit Us Up Before Someone Else Builds Your Idea

Brands Logo Get A Free Quote
© Idea Usher INC. 2025 All rights reserved.